Earlier this year, Karan Thapar, one of India’s more acerbic interviewers, interviewed N. R. Narayana Murthy on a range of big issues for CNN-IBN. Please click on the link above to hear the first portion of that interview.
These are the salient points Murthy makes.
# The responsibility of government is to ensure people are happy and prosperous. To make them prosperous, you need economic growth. To achieve economic growth, you need to encourage entrepreneurship. That means creation of more and more jobs.
It’s not the responsibility of government to create jobs. Its responsibility is to create and environment where there are greater and greater incentives for more and more entrepreneurship to create a larger and larger number of jobs.
# Capitalism is about providing equal opportunities for people, giving them the incentive to perform and creating the competitive conditions.
All countries which embraced communism have failed. Even Cuba. When Fidel Castro fell ill, the only person he could trust was his brother!
I believe in compassionate capitalism where there is capitalism in the mind, socialism in the heart, and corporations which make profits will have to live in harmony with the society around them.
# True socialism is what previls in Sweden and Norway. We followed pseudo-socialism in the 1950s and 60s.
# We have the largest mass of unemployed people. We have the largest mass of illiterates and semi-literates. Agriculture isn’t growing fast enough. We have to shift them from agriculture to low-tech like China has done (140 million jobs in 11 years).
We can’t have a situation where 65 per cent of the people account for only 26 per cent of the GDP.
# All over the word, it has been demonstrated that only when you have the right to retrench will you become bold enough to create more and more jobs.
We must be bold enough to bring labour reforms and at the same time have a good safety net so that even if people are retrenched they don’t have to worry for 3-4 months.
# We must privatise public sector units. Government should not be in business. The navaratnas should perform even better as if they are private sector units.
Infrastructure—airports, roads, ports, power—should be built by private sector. Government should create the policies that encourage the private sector and if necessary act as the regulator.
Even in education and health care, I do believe in urban areas the government should leave it to the private sector. Government should provide subsidies by way of vouchers as Milton Friedman suggested.
# The retail sector should be opened up. If the existing mom-and-pop shops are suffering due to the entry of large Indian groups, then we can go the whole hog and allow large MNCs. They will bring in the best technology, the practices. The consumer benefits in the end.
# There are sections of our society which need subsidies. But we do not have the accountability. We need to work on a model which enhances accountability so that the government brings its good intentions, and the private sector brings its efficiency and technology.
10 April 2007 at 12:39 pm
Labor reforms is very essential in a country like India where unemployment numbers are huge. A robust and a dynamic labor market can create more jobs than one with stringent labor laws. The US economy (which has relatively liberal labor laws) boasts of a lower unemployment rate than for that matter, France which has tougher labor laws.
The Indian job situation looks quite scary. You have 65% of people with very little education producing 25% of our output. Agriculture can no longer sustain and support such staggering number of people. There has to be a structural shift to other areas. For that we need a better labor market where recruitment and retrenchment is easier. You cannot have an enterprise that pays salaries to its workers when it is not making money. They have to move to other areas. It sounds harsh, but then there is no easy solution to this problem. The Government must take a pro-active role in using the labor and creating infrastructural assets out of them.
10 April 2007 at 1:16 pm
I saw this interview and i think this is perhaps the only interview where Karan Thapar seemed initmidated by his guest and squeaked like a rat ( lets says mouse) instead of roaring.Thapar replaced his aggression with understanding and avoided asking EVEN ONE TOUGH question..
Thapar behaved like a poodle and the outcome appeared like a carefully calibrated pr exercise for Mr Murthy.
Really was a pain watching Thapar getting overwhelmed by his guest..trust me.
10 April 2007 at 2:40 pm
with answers like these we better write an early obit for murthy’s presidency. no party in india will be comfortable and no section of the society would be happy with what narayanamurthy has to say. nrn, i should say is an intellectual moron. i really pity his current position. nobody seems to be taking him seriously, yet he has not stopped waxing eloquent on the world. sudhakka is perhaps the only one who is charmed by his ‘visionary’ replies.
i disagree with andy. karan has suceeded in eliciting some very interesting answers that thoroughly expose nrn’s true nature, not that we needed karan to know that.
my guess is that nrn will next try for bharat ratna and there again will have muck on his face.
great job churumuri. keep it up.
10 April 2007 at 2:40 pm
KP/Editor,
Would be interesting if you blogged sometime about Sir MV’s thoughts on matters such as population control, urban planning, social development etc.
We could contrast the thoughts of a true nation builder to those of a guy with a psuedo-American accent who made his wealth by labour arbitrage (I love this term!). Not that there is any comparison between the two, just the way NRN is going on a media blitz to (probably) further his political ambitions, his employees may start comparing him to Sir MV next…
10 April 2007 at 2:55 pm
kila kilaaa!!
aamEle dEsha nE maari biDOdu!!! aavaaga dEshOddhaara aagutte!!
kila kilaaa!!
10 April 2007 at 2:56 pm
There is sense in what NRN says. We need the retail sector to be opened up for the kind of job opportunities it will generate. The only thing successive governments in India did right was to borrow heavily and get our balance of payment situation to a position where IMF and the rest could dictate terms to us and force us to liberalize. It’s time the government became accountable. We sure do need the efficiencies, the technology and the jobs the private sector can bring.
10 April 2007 at 5:16 pm
Interestingly, Sir MV himself championed capitalism and free enterprise. He was a strong advocate of industrialization and had serious disagreements with Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi believed in having cottage industries at the village level along with agriculture. Sir MV was of the opinion that big public-private industries was absolutely necessary. The two are said to have exchanged their ideas, although neither was able to convince the other of their stand. But both of them respected each other.
It was Sir MV who brought hydroelectric power to India. It was he again who convinced one big industrialist( I think it was Walchand Hirachand) to establish Premier Automobiles Limited. And of course, he was also instrumental in establishing the VISL plant.
10 April 2007 at 6:57 pm
Well MV was many other things as well- Mysore University, Krishnaraja Sagar, State bank of Mysore, Kannada Sahitya Parishad- all owe quite a bit to the genius of MV. Above evreything else was the transparency in public life that simply stood out and made the man acceptable to even those who didnt neccasarily agree with his philosophy of industrialise or perish. Can Narayana Murthy honestly claim that kind of sincerity?!
10 April 2007 at 8:55 pm
i have not contributed economically or for social causes relative to my income when compared to NRN and his family. Let me keep my mouth shut.
10 April 2007 at 10:24 pm
I am not sheep.
10 April 2007 at 10:53 pm
[...] …is to have anonymous (and semi-anonymous) Internet surfers be your judge, jury and executioner (so to [...]
11 April 2007 at 12:11 am
Wow this is precious. You ought to have contributed economically or to social causes relative to income (whatever that crap means) to call a silly fool a silly fool. The jury is always anonymous as is the executioner. But this I would imagine is merely calling the bluff of a pompous ass- Narayana Murthy and is no trial at all. But then his idolaters would beg to differ I am sure.
11 April 2007 at 12:18 am
In the West, when giving examples of under-production, under-achievement and bad overmanning, they quote the Indian Railway. If you want to blame blame India’s galloping population. Given this rate of population growth, I do not see what solution any economic approach will provide.
11 April 2007 at 1:21 am
Well said, Shashi.
Each to his own merits…
11 April 2007 at 8:40 am
NRN, nor his idolaters, has ever compared himself to Sir MV. For those who know better, NRN can never be compared to such great nation builders like Sir MV. So why this comparison by his bashers??
Next step would be to compare NRN with Mahatma Gandhi and say how great Gandhi was…. and all that blah. I guess, NRN’s bashers have a serious complex against him.
11 April 2007 at 2:15 pm
Goldstar it’s not a complex … its a common Indian trait. We are like this only.
24 April 2007 at 5:26 pm
Anyone who advocates Milton Friedman’s ideas does not deserve the inconsequential and largely ceremonial post that is the Presidency of the Indian Republic. Kalam for a second term as President! :D
Jokes apart, NRN seems to possess some clarity on India’s economic ills. Hats off to him.