‘The man who sowed the dragon seeds of hatred’

L.K. Advani’s memoirs My Country, My Life is a remarkable literary effort, more remarkable than literary.

Its timing, on the eve of an election for which he is a prime ministerial candidate, is intended to air-brush his legacy and keep him in the mind’s-eye of voters, like the tell-all tomes of American presidential hopefuls. Its size is intended to show how different he is from others of his ilk, that they don’t make them like him any more. And its economy with the truth, even at the risk of alienating friends and colleagues, suggests a serious desire to pull a halo over his head, come hell or high water or both.

From a media perspective, though, two things stand out. One, the ease with which the 80-year-old Loh Purush allowed his eyes to well up for the benefit of the (pseudo-secular) English news channel cameras. And two, the extraordinary reverence with which (pseudo-secular) English interviewers and reviewers have treated him, as if they have been handed a tablet from the high heavens. Ram bhakt (as Atal Behari Vajpayee used to call Advani) may think that having reshaped the grammar of India’s politics, he has now earned his right to be looked upon as a “statesman”.

But do the titans of television have to wear kid gloves while jostling with a glowering giant?

Does every MP elected from Gandhinagar necessarily get blessed with the attributes of the man after whom the City and the constituency are named? Merely because he gives convoluted answers while meaningfully rubbing his palms to even simple questions, can Advani wipe away a trail littered with the blood stains of innocent Indians slaughtered at the altar of majority communalism? Can he divorce himself from his seminal role in the institutionalisation of hate—the demonisation of the other—as the dominant feature of the discourse?

Can the emperor’s new clothes (stitched by a ghost with enormous stamina to last 986 pages) blind us to the fact that he was naked in the hamaam not too long ago?

It takes 95-year-old Khushwant Singh to call the bluff on the “man who sowed the dragon seeds of hatred”. In the latest issue of Outlook, the “dirty old man of Indian journalism”, who signed Advani’s nomination papers after the anti-Sikh riots of 1984 but fell out with him after the Ayodhya movement in early 1990s, provides some much-needed perspective:

# My disenchantment began after he launched his rath yatra from Somnath to Ayodhya. When he was Union home minister, I said on his face, “Mr Advani, you sowed the dragon seeds of hatred in this country….” In his address, he said he would answer my charges at a more appropriate time. I hoped to find them in his autobiography; they are not there.

# I turned the pages to see what he had to say about Mahatma Gandhi who remains the national touchstone to test political and moral decisions. He tells us that the RSS held Gandhi in high esteem and he, in turn, praised its military discipline. When Gandhi heard that cadres of the RSS were also involved in communal riots and took on Muslim hoodlums in street battles which erupted periodically, he sent for the sarsanghchalak.

The latter explained, “If we object to the conduct of some Muslims in our society, it is not because they follow Islam but rather because of their lack of loyalty to India. The partition of India has proven us right. Therefore to call the RSS anti-secular is to show one’s ignorance of what secularism stands for and what the RSS stands for.” Advani adds: “This was my first lesson in secularism. I was twenty-one then.”…

If the RSS is secular, how many Muslims and Christians does it have on its rolls?

# Advani was 14 years old when he enrolled himself as a worker of the RSS in Karachi. His views on secularism are naive beyond belief. He tries to equate Gandhi’s concept of Ram rajya in which all religions will be treated with equal respect—sarva dharma samabhava—with the RSS concept of Hindutva, “a noble concept,” according to him. The RSS was suspect in the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi. His assassin had been a member of the organisation. Advani tells us that on Gandhi’s murder the RSS was ordered to observe 13 days of mourning.

# He, more than anyone else, sensed that Islamophobia was deeply ingrained in the minds of millions of Hindus and it only needed a spark to set it ablaze…. Advani claims that breaking the [Babri] mosque was not on his agenda and he actually sent Murli Manohar Joshi and Uma Bharati from the dais to plead with the breakers to desist. If that is so, why were the two seen embracing each other and rejoicing when the nefarious task was completed?

Advani records the jubilation that followed at the site and along his triumphal return to Delhi. Repercussions were felt over the world: Hindu and Sikh temples were targeted by irate Muslims from Bangladesh to UK. Relations between Hindus and Muslims have never been the same in India. There were communal confrontations in different parts of the country: the serial blasts in Bombay, the attack on Sabarmati Express in Godhra and the massacre of innocent Muslims in Gujarat can all be traced back to the fall of the Babri Masjid.

# Advani has quite a lot to say about Narendra Modi, the chief minister of Gujarat. He exonerates him from the charge of allowing the massacre of innocent Muslims following the attack on the Sabarmati Express at Godhra. It is a symbiotic relationship: Modi helps Advani win elections from Gandhinagar in Gujarat; Advani stands by Modi whenever his conduct comes under question from the higher echelons of the BJP.

# Either we remain a secular state envisaged by Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru or we succumb to Advani’s interpretation of it and become the Hindu Secular Socialist Republic of Bharatvarsha. Perish the thought.

Read the full review: Ghost burial that wasn’t to be

Photograph: courtesy NDTV

Also read: CHURUMURI POLL: Is L.K. Advani lying on IC-814?

Vir Sanghvi: Advani’s Hindutva versus Modi’s Hindutva

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

27 Responses to “‘The man who sowed the dragon seeds of hatred’”

  1. nilesh Says:

    Khuswant singh has also mentioned advani as a clean politician. Is this not enough.

    Every political party has blood on its hands. The question is which actions were in national interest and which were for personal

  2. goutam Says:

    India all out 76 at Ahamadabad. Narendra Modi. Advani and Hindutva are responsible for this. INC should take stern action about this!!

  3. shreeram Says:

    Breaking news…… Attack on the Newyork WTC twin towers(9/11) was also in response to demolition of babri masjid.. the attackers who destroyed babri masjid had used tools which were made in USA…

  4. vikram Kamath Says:

    Compare to his contemporaries except the communist We can call Advani a leader with clear vision of where he belongs to. We have seen leaders from other parties and in BJP itself (likes of AB Vajpayee) him self sitting on the fence and don’t know where to go. They shift their gears as the occasion permits. Congress all along became a hidden wolf for Hindus as Muslims and Christian vote banks clearly on their mind. Others are not even worth of mentioning.

    At least Advani has clear views on which side he belongs to and which side he don’t. Many people raised Jinna issue and try to malign his Hindu leader reputation which he still struggles to come out clean. To date i certainly prefer him than any other leader, just because he is knows clearly where he stands.

  5. desi homosapien Says:

    Though 15 to 20 years have passed since Babri Masjid demolition, the blood on Advani’s hands have not dried yet. It should not. For, nothing can compensate for the thousands of lives that were lost in post-Babri Masjid demolition carnage.

    He should not become the Prime Minister of the country at any cost !

  6. Aatmasakshi Says:

    It is a sad reflection of the Indian media if the first proper critique of L.K. Advani’s book should come from Khushwant Singh and that too just by reading it using the index pages! Where are the Inder Malhotras, Nihal Singhs, H.K. Duas, M.J. Akbars—people who have lived through the very times Advani chronicles? Advani needs a much more thorough and objective appraisal than Khushwant’s but it is a start.

    The Commutwits will of course find it tempting to pin Advani down on the Kandahar controversy, and so on. But to give the devil his due, Advani’s role in redrawing political contours of the country and consolidating the Hindu votebank, while making minority appeasement a bad word, cannot be underestimated.

    “Hate” has clearly been a potent weapon in the Hindutwits’ armoury. But hasn’t blood been the carpet on which post-Emergency Indian politics has been built? It has required innocent people to be slayed to propitiate the demons and 1984, 1992, 2002, are only the most vivid examples. If it’s all done in the name of the gods—human and otherwise—why would Advani have any remorse, Khushwant or no Khushwant?

  7. Mysore Boy Says:

    With due respect to Mr. Khushwant Singh’s scholarship, the fact is Hindutva clearly recognizes “sarva dharma samabhav” – the central tenet of Vedantic Hindism or “Sanatan Dharma.” Hindutva is an operational response to the illogical evangelism, or bullying, of the Islamic/Christian traditions.

    Anyone who cares to read H.V. Sheshadri’s book on the RSS, or the editorials by Hedgewar or Pt. Upadhyay or Golwalkar, knows that Hindutva is an inclusive, respectful, philosophy. Hindutva can be a way of life for not just Hindus and Buddhists, but for Muslims and Christians as well.

    What was Pt. Nehru’s secularism but a political packaging of Hindutva designed to assuage unfounded fears of the Muslim community. With due respect again, Mr. Nehru’s ad hoc politics deeply hurt genuine secularism (not only in India but in Tibet as well).

  8. mayura Says:

    >>Relations between Hindus and Muslims have never been the same in India. There were communal confrontations in different parts of the country: the serial blasts in Bombay, the attack on Sabarmati Express in Godhra and the massacre of innocent Muslims in Gujarat can all be traced back to the fall of the Babri Masjid.
    >>

    Great discovery by this bewdaa unemployed sardaar. When was the hindu muslim relation ever normal in India, ever since the muslim tyaranny began from mohd, ghori down to the present day ghori’s like MAJ. So why is it any special now. For that matter muslim do not assimilate with any other religion not only in India but also world over…just take a look around. The serial blasts were caused by the D company with help from the ISI, so how come it is not mentioned. No amount of excuses can justify the brutal burning of men,women and children in the godhra carnage, babri or no babri demolition.

    This unemployed (S)ex editor should stop smoking pot before he reviews a book.

  9. Melange Says:

    There are two events in the early nineties that laid to rest any notions of India ever having an intelligent political system: Advani’s Hindu right and V.P. Singh’s casteist left. They both pandered to the worst of Human denominators: Identity.

    The major portion of the Indian populace is given to prejudices of all sorts. The Indian electorate is uninformed and too stupid to make choices based on ideas, not identity. India’s politicians represent the vast majority of her people: illiterate, mean, petty, divisive, unimaginative and exceedingly corrupt. Yes, Advani is a crook, but so are all the people that bought his wares (lots, lots of them).

    If India is country where a Advani and a Karunanidhi are considered “statesman”( trying not to die of laughter!!), then what does it say about her people? What is it about the Indian people that lets people like Advani thrive? The answer to that question will be scary, but truth nevertheless.

    Let us, of course, not forget the “Indian National Congress” that sat on India’s throat for decades; that worked hard to lay the groundwork for the monsters that arose in the early nineties;

    Add to all this, regional chauvinism, fights for resources and a population that is projected to touch 2 billion, then one can only sadly conclude that India is a train wreck waiting to happen.

  10. chenchu Says:

    I cannot understand how Churmuri, an otherwise balanced blog churns out such trash when it comes to politics. Apart from Advani, exactly who among the politicians is there who even has an iota of rashtra-bhakti?
    Congress? who have been selling out our country, running it like a personal fiefdom?
    Or the left, whose ultimate aim is to integrate India with China? (Yes, they still believe that world revolution is round the corner, and their low-brow “scientific” socialist orthodoxy is indeed very strong)

    Our civilization is at a crossroads and we need a leader with at least some understanding of our way of life, and the ability to rejuvenate our land and people after the millennium long degradation, loot and plunder.

    Most Indians sadly do not apprehend the seriousness of the matter. They assume that India will go on. What is happening now is the inevitable semitization of India. Semitization will definitely lead to mob rule and trust me, the liberals will no longer have their rights with which they are able to attack Indians nowadays. North India is almost gone out of the pale of the Indic civilization, and the South, though more resilient, is being subtly compromised by various other means.

    Perhaps the “liberal” who wrote this blog-post would like an India where all traces of the Inidic civilization are absent, and replaced by a Saudi-Arabia/America like paradise.

  11. Anon Says:

    For many entertaining suicidal thoughts during Mandal days, Advani was a life saver. People were overjoyed to see Chandrashekar in PM’s office.

    VP got his cancer treated in UK with Indian tax payer’s money. Not from an OBC doctor.

  12. oldboy Says:

    How much ever one may criticize Advani, the truth is we need such hawkish leaders. Just look at how the present govt has failed to take advantage of the Tibet uprising because of the commie pressure. I am really curious to see how Advani, if he becomes the PM, tackles China. He has already made the right noises w.r.t Tibet. I am sure Indian diplomacy will get some teeth if Advani becomes the PM.

  13. ptcbus Says:

    I can not imagine our country having such a divisive politician as the prime-minister. If Advani becomes the PM we can expect to see even more frequent occurrence of events like demolition of Babri Masjid and riots in Gujarat.

  14. vikram Kamath Says:

    Hindu-Muslim relations were never been the same after Muslims invaders land their foot in India and start converting and killing Hindus. There is lot of comment above that after babri Masjid so many bloody events occurred between Hindus and Muslims.

    Let me ask you, the biggest Hindu Muslim riots taken place from 1940 to 1948 during freedom movement and after partition. Who is responsible?

    Advani or Congress and their so called secular leaders like Gandhi and Nehru? Nehru not even spared soldiers standing on Himalayan glaciers facing China in 1962. Let Us try them also for letting so many people killed by their poor vision and outlook from 1940-1962.

  15. TKM Says:

    Advani should have dipped himself in a tub of white paint rather than writing a book of lies in preparation to become the PM, his sole ambition.
    By writing a book with highly controversial facts and lies Mr. Advani was probably planning to raise some moolah for his for his election fund, a la Jaswant Singh.
    The day Advani becomes the PM , India will detach from the Himalayas and sink in the ocean with shame.

  16. pragmatic Says:

    oh well, here comes some Tamil K Mohammed with the declaration that the book is full of lies!

    Mr. TKM, did you even bother to read the book completely before commenting? You just proved yourself a moron here! congrats!!

  17. TKM Says:

    Should I call you a saffron crass, Mr. pragm…c what ever it is? The way you figured out that I am ‘Tamail K Mohammed’ and ‘moron’ shows your ability in understanding and analyzing. Did you read the book upside down or in your sleep? Your thinking and senses have the quality and clarity of the gutter water to say the least. Grow up Mr. Crass!!

  18. pragmatic Says:

    @ TKM

    well, I can call you anything. Same was the funda used by you to call the book a bunch of lies. Had Sonia Gandhi written something, you would have licked it, probably.

    And you call me a saffron crass. Well, I am not. You also say that my thinking has gutter water clarity. Again its not! Its just that you are a blind and dumb as*hole.

  19. TKM Says:

    ” America and England are very developed. Even the beggars there speak fluent English’. The cultural and mental development of the authors of some of the comments has to be measured with that yardstick.

  20. captainjohann Says:

    I was immensely disappointed with Mr.Advani disowining his role in Kandahar hostage drama. Again he disowns his role in Babri demolition. He should have remained silent. The people who destroyed babri have done irreperable damage to our Muslim bretheren who are now fed with false propaganda.babri masjid was not a mosque but a victory structure with the Four black stone pillars sticking like sore thumb amongst it white walls. But today we donot have proof to show to the young Muslims who are fed with hate propaganda. He should have shown some light why Sudharshan wanted him removed in the name of oldage and how he survived?

  21. bhargav thaker Says:

    my country my life is one of the best part of advaniji`s life to see how he is so simple & petroist. if bajpai is bhishmapitamah of our politics than advani is krishna of this politics.due to a gujarati,i m also proud of advaniji if he becom a P.M.wish U all the best ADVANIJI. your`s faithfully
    BHARGAV THAKER
    (AHMEDABAD)

  22. wtf Says:

    @captainjohann

    >>The people who destroyed babri have done irreperable damage to our Muslim bretheren

    What about hundreds of Hindu temples that were razed to the ground by the invading Muslim rulers? If one masjid demolition can do irreparable damage to our Muslim brethren, then think about the effect of demolition of hundreds of temples on our Hindu brethren.

  23. Chamundi Hill Says:

    Show me one man in Indian politics who could ask Mr. Mia Musharaff to return Dawood and link it to his commitment to terrorism. This is real diplomacy. It made Musharaff go on the back foot straight away and get struck there. His revenge ? Call the media and go back like a coward.

    On the other hand, we have Cong which keeps on releasing sermons with at regular intervals that the public should maintain peace, whenever there is a terror attack.

    This one incident shows what material LKA is made off. I am sure there are many more incidents which make him a man of vision and his response to it.

  24. Chaitanya N Says:

    How the hell are people who comment on this blog so bloody stupid. You justify an atrocity committed by some Hindus (Babri Masjid) in 1992 by pointing to atrocities committed by Muslim rulers in the 15th Century? What are you guys retarded? Certain Muslims in the 15th Century committed crimes against some Hindus in the 15th Century, therefore we Hindus in the 20th Century must take revenge on the Muslims living in the 20th Century?????? Have you people no brain?

  25. vaidehi Says:

    he great leader and a true leader.

  26. Vamanan Says:

    Demonising Advani is not going to help….Portraying the RSS as enemy no. i will also not do…the RSS is only the reaction to the continued disrespect to Hinduism…in fact it is the idealogy of the RSS that all religions are true…
    The Hindu right owes its existence and raison d’etre to the stupid secularists and marxists who deride everything HIndu day in and day out…When Hindus learn to appreciate the great legacy of their religion…and rid it of banes like untouchability, there won’t be any need for such parties…Till then, parties like the BJP will be there, and will be a force to reckon with…A word to those who don’t like Advani or the RSS…forget them and show your appreciation for great things in Hindu culture…That will help you more in achieving your aim..

  27. Saurav Basu Says:

    Check my more balanced review of Advani’s book instead of this *secular * trash of Krishna Prasad

    http://books.sulekha.com/book/my-country-my-life/reviews/14263.htm

Leave a Reply