Why Andhra is epicentre of the biggest scam

R. Jagannathan in DNA (Daily News & Analysis):

“For the last five years, India’s central government has been run by the states. More or less. We have a central government only in name; it is neither central to us nor does it govern. It is run by a cabal of state-level strongmen for defending their narrow political bases, not for the benefit of the nation as a whole.

“Many key economic ministries are run by people with state-level interests in mind. Thus, we have a Lalu Prasad running the railways to impress voters in Bihar; we have a telecom ministry that is run from Chennai. This is not only because there are regional parties running central ministries.

“Even the core constituent of the UPA, the Congress, nominally a national party, has been reduced to a regional power, thanks to the weight of MPs from one single state — Andhra Pradesh. Till recently, Andhra was the only big state the Congress ran on its own – without a coalition partner. If the Congress had not been dynastic, Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy might well have been PM of a patchwork coalition.

“If you don’t think so, ask yourself: why has the biggest corporate scandal of the UPA government surfaced in Andhra Pradesh (Satyam) and not somewhere else? Why have some of the biggest contracts of the central government gone to Andhra companies? Examples: the Mumbai and Delhi airports (despite the power of the Ambanis), the Bangalore metro, the countrywide shower of projects on Maytas, the Satyam promoters’ real estate and infrastructure fief.

“Scandals always erupt close to the centre of power, and in the Congress the effective state power is the Andhra CM.”

Read the full article: Why Andhra is epicentre of the biggest scam

About these ads

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

65 Responses to “Why Andhra is epicentre of the biggest scam”

  1. vinay Says:

    well said bro …

  2. Goldstar Says:

    During the peak of the stock market boom in 2007, there was a IPO from an Andhra based “infrastructure” company every other week – GMR, GVK, IVRCL, KCR, Maytas… The next big scams will surely be from these companies.

  3. Yella Ok Says:

    I agree with many points – Andhra-scam relation, center state relation, ministers running ministries with eye on state vote bank, etc.

    There were scams galore even earlier. in the early 2000s – according to this hypothesis, one could argue that there was NDA and Naidu relationship and hence, etc.

    There is probably one other relationship – which is that there is simply more enterprise/entrepreneurship in Andhra – and indeed in gujarat from where we had scamsters such as Harshad Mehta and Kunal Parekh.

    So, what is better? More entrepreneurship and more scams or less entrepreneurship and fewer scams. Ofcourse, ideal situation is more ent’ship with lower scams. Karnataka would greatly benefit from more ent’ship of its own people.

    By way of a disclaimer, so that the debate does not get hijacked onto a different level, I am not a Telugu, I am not from Andhra, hold no special interest in any Andhrites.

  4. Gururaj B.N. Says:

    Excellent analysis. Your view is wholly on the mark!

  5. nagarajarao@tarikere Says:

    When BJP was in power at the centre, TDP in Andhra Pradesh government has always taken maximum benefit from the centre , without being responsible for any wrong doings. When Congress was in power, the leaders representing the congress party, alway took the cake out, for their state. Thus, AP was always benefited. So, also the dubious personalities never got unpunished for their misdeeds. Most of the big contracts works are awarded to contractors from AP. Naturally, they would have bribed the local government

  6. Bhamy V Shenoy Says:

    Your analysis of government at the center is to be complimented. While for a country like India, less centralization is a good one. But this is not what is happening. Depending upon the MPs one control, central ministers are exploiting the power of the central for their own good rather than for the nation. This is bad and your highlighting is timely for the next election.

    However I am not sure how Satyam has any thing to do with it. It is true it has international ramifications. There have been bigger scams than Stayma like Harshad Mehta, Telgi, Mining in the recent years and to conclude based on one Stayam that Hyderabad has been an epi center may be misleading.

  7. AnotherOne Says:

    >>nagarajarao@tarikere Says:
    >>Thus, AP was always benefited.

    I agree this during Chandra Babu period, this is not completely true now, AP as a state lost while businessmen, politicians, contractors from Andhra got favored and made a killing. Congress party had to be funded(primarily) by AP as it is congis’ largest state. So they came up with a grand plan of “Jalayagnam” to help the farmers by constructing irrigation projects worth of 1 lakh crores (yes I am not sure of how many zeros). Many of the projects are in different stages of start. Out of this small, sum how much has been gone to whom is a big mystery, but as I see in AP there is green revolution. So as a thank you gesture many people in the chain get benefited. This is apart from the other big “Indiira, Rajiv,….” scam oops schemes.

  8. Why Andhra is epicentre of the biggest scam « churumuri | Who Has The Biggest Says:

    [...] See the original post here:  Why Andhra is epicentre of the biggest scam « churumuri [...]

  9. Faldo Says:

    Good analysis! Does this mean smaller states are the answer to avoid disproportionate power being excercised by certain political groupings?

  10. dharma Says:

    So vote Congress back to power!

  11. Tathagata Mukherjee Says:

    I would add one more point- very existance of Congress in power at the center was thanks to Andhra. Had TDP not lost so miserably, Cong would not have got 6 seats more than BJP in all India tally- thus we would have seen another NDA Govt still ruling at the center (possibly with DMK, Sharad Pawar, Paswan as ministers in the NDA).

    There was enough warning shots- most notably from boss of Delhi Metro.

    Failure to pay enough attention to Sreedharan’s warning by media is unpardonable. They have equal blame to share- being engaged in folliwng brief of Indian Obama Rahul and her Mother Sonia.

  12. B.N.Gururaj Says:

    “First, we need to invert the economic pyramid by making states the primary entities of taxation and economic policy. All taxation, barring customs, should be state-led, and the finance commissions should decide what share of state revenues should go to the centre and not the other way around.”

    This recipe of the author is sure way to financial disaster with whales like Mayawati, Shibu Soren, YSR waiting to grab every available buck. Our States are notorious for financial mismanagement. WB Government once procured foreign loan for its own corporation, and drew that money for the government’s revenue expenditure! Without the Centre’s control over the States’ borrowings, each would have run up huge debts.

    The article starts with the lament that the Centre has become weak and the States are effectively running the centre. But, the solution proposed by the author is diametrically opposite. It will accelerate the demise of the centre. iI the Central Government has to wait for the grants from the States, the country’s security, defence and foreign affairs will be shot to hell. The disaster surely lies that way.

  13. Simple Says:

    The authour is selectively quoting statsitics to prove a misguided point

    1. he says some of the biggest central govt. contracts went to Andhra companies. does he have an entire list of contracts awarded by central govt. to other states?

    What percentage of contracts went to Andhra?

    2. He says the biggest scam of the UPA govt. Hello? this is not a UPA govt. scam. It is a scam by a private company . This Mr. Raju was cooking books when BJP was in power.

    It all started when NDA was in power.

    3. The percentage of Contracts given by Telugu desam to Raju’s companies is almost twice that of the contracts given by Cong, which is only about 6%.

    See this link:

    http://www.ghotala.in/2009/01/19/cid-gets-custody-of-raju-brothers/

    Here is a small extract from the above link.

    “Thee Congress government has dug out statistics to say that 12 per cent of government contracts during the TDP government were given to the Satyam group whereas the Congress gave less than half that percentage number.”

    So, this author Mr. jagannathan you should know that Telugu Desam and BJP awarded more contracts to Raju than Congress!.

  14. Chintaka Says:

    Simpelloo… the bird…..

    No need to quote statistics of the entire contracts given by the central government. What the author has quoted is sufficient to prove the nexus between CONgies and the business people.

    Oh really, this is not a UPA govt scam? You are right. For a change. This is a scam purely of CONgies and its state government. Look at the convenient arrest of the Raju brothers and their refusal to appear before SEBI. Do you think this could have happened had the state govt not been friendly to the Rajus?

    By the way, what extract you have quoted from the link is something which the CONgies are claiming. Coming from the devil’s mouth, it is hard to believe, isnt it???

    Simpelloo.. the bird, you know you are a character… namoona….when someone says congress running the goverment in center you jump up and down, froth in the mouth and claim it is UPA govt. But now you are saying scam happened in BJP govt… dude, applying the same logic should it not be NDA government of which BJP was only a part??

    But then logic and facts, these are something you are not familiar with. Right Mr.Bird???? ( you know the name of this bird, dont you simpelloo!!!!)

  15. Kumar Says:

    The Satyam/Maytas scam is definitely a Congress scam.But the airport contracts were given primarily during the NDA rule.So, the author is half-right.

  16. fundae Says:

    Jagannathan avare, swalpa control maaDkoLi please. There’s a difference between analysis and piling implausible reasons on top of unlikely co-incidences to justify whatever you want.

  17. kharaharapriya Says:

    Simple,
    Do you have proof on the 6 and 12% numbers? It’s something that caangis are saying. It would be more credible if some economist said that.
    Even then arguing with just percentages will not be intelligent, because you need to look at how much money does the 6% during YSR compare to 12% during naidu.
    6% of x can be greater than 12% of y. It can also mean YSR was lucky to get more number of projects in total, compared to naidu.

    BTW, have you studied some math or are you an “arts” guy like barkha? One thing is sure you have a poor sense of logical interpretation.

    It all started during NDA, why did it not end when the “holy” caangis and UPA took over? May be BJP folks had got some maata mantra done to disillusion the caangies. Rite, SIMPLE?? :P

    Chintaka,

    “Namoona”. You are spot on :) BTW, whats the name of the bird sir?? :)

  18. Sandesh Says:

    Yaake kharaharapriya avare
    Simple hatra tale chachkotira?? Simple saahebrige respond maadidashtu avru issuesna derail maadta hogtare.. Bird hesru nijakku gottilva ;)

  19. AnotherOne Says:

    Simple Anna,

    6% of one lakh crores is more than 12% of 10,000 crores (I am not sure about the exact numbers but these are best approimations google out yourself). This is another number game by the congis just like Raju. Please, do not try to fool yourself and others. Typical Congi style!!

  20. kharaharapriya Says:

    Sandesh,
    If we dont refute simple simons claims, he will start building castles in air :) He will take wrong advantage of the saying “Maunam sammati lakshanam”. :)

  21. Simple Says:

    Hello Simple baiters

    1. None of you are willing to go by facts.

    2. Jagganath throws some anti cong facts..and you want to accept it meekly.

    3. If I dig out statistics in NDA period, people like Chintaka says it does not matter? why? does NDA have the sole right over scams?

    4. Do you or don’t you guys agree that the scam started under NDA?

    5. Do you or don’t you guys agree TDP leader paraded Raju in front of Bill Gates and Clinton?

    6. Do you or don’t you agree that 12% of contracts were given by TDP CM to Raju? If you don’t agree then give me statistics to prove your point. Since you have none you keep blabbering.

    7. Another one, if you don’t know exact figures, don’t argue.

    8. If 6%of X, is greater than 12% of Y, does that mean the govt which gave 12% contract to Raju is not guily? You have done your math but probably you did not take lessons in Moral Science. Tsk tsk.

    9. Chintaka, you blabber nonense. I ignore you.

  22. Simple Says:

    Hello Simple baiters

    1. None of you are willing to go by facts.

    2. Jagganath throws some anti cong facts..and you want to accept it meekly.

    3. If I dig out statistics in NDA period, people like Chintaka says it does not matter? why? does NDA have the sole right over scams?

    4. Do you or don’t you guys agree that the scam started under NDA?

    5. Do you or don’t you guys agree TDP leader paraded Raju in front of Bill Gates and Clinton?

    6. Do you or don’t you agree that 12% of contracts were given by TDP CM to Raju? If you don’t agree then give me statistics to prove your point. Since you have none you keep blabbering.

    7. Another one, if you don’t know exact figures, don’t argue.

    8. If 6%of X, is greater than 12% of Y, does that mean the govt which gave 12% contract to Raju is not guilty? You have done your math but probably you did not take lessons in Moral Science. Tsk tsk.

    9. Chintaka, you blabber nonense. I ignore you.

  23. Simple Says:

    Also, when the author says many central govt. contracts went to Andhra companies, he showcases just two or three.

    Proabaly there are 300 central govt. contracts which went to other states?

    The percentage of contracts which went to andhra companies could be less than one percent?

    Neither the author not chintaka nor haraharapriay nor another one have the facts, yet the continue to believe that MANY govt. contracts went to Andhra companies.

    Poor Math. Poor Logic.

  24. Chintaka Says:

    Simpelloo.. the bird, effects of waking up the whole night showing, eh???

    Dude,

    Let us look at it this way. When BJP led NDA government was in power between 1999-2004, there were several BJP led state governments. Notably in Gujarat. Yet not a single allegation came against BJP that it favoured any company from any of the states it ruled during its regime.

    TDP was a different issue. They were a part of the government. They were not BJP. Now if the same TDP were to form an alliance with CONgress at some point of time, what will you say???

    In the first place, do you understand what the author is saying? Since understanding anything in its right perspective does not come to you naturally, whats the point???

  25. kharaharapriya Says:

    Simple,
    You are really made of thick skin man. How shamelessly you defend the 12% and 6% without hard and clinching evidence :) From where did moral science come into picture?

    Please tell me da, which arts college did you study. :P Did you even complete your degree? Or do you have some caangi contacts who passed you , that you keep chanting caangi chaalisa always to return the favor? :)

    Chintaka,
    We are all eager to know the name of the bird. Hints please :)

  26. Simple Says:

    Chintaka

    There were plenty of scams in NDA govt. from Ram Naik’s petrol allotment s scam to Bangaru Laxman’s cottuption scam.

    In contrast UPA has much much lesser scams.

    Kharaharapriya.

    I qouted what Congress told. If you think it is wrong. Prove it wrong.
    the onus is on you. Neither TDP nor BJP has said the statistics given by Cong is wrong.

    They are silent.

    means, they agree with the figure.

    Also, why are you getting personal with me? why do u want to know where i studied, if i have a degree or if cong guys helped me pass.

    This is a forum to discuss public issues, not private lives

    Lay off me!

  27. Chintaka Says:

    Simpellooo…

    The difference between BJP and CONgress when it comes to scams is that BJP gets caught while Congies, with the blatant support of media, will get away with it.

    The so called scams which you mentioned were happening during Congress regime too…. if I remember right, SC/HC had cancelled the allotments made by Capt. Satish Sharma. And you know who he is, dont you…

    Bangaru Lakshman was not a scam. It was greed. Of one politician taking bribes. And after that incident, he is nowhere in picture while scamsters are abound in Congress…

    A rapist, in the court of law will say that he has not committed any offence. Same way with Congies too… and when it has lickers like you who will lick whatever it doles out, why worry??

    BTW, i sort of getting the reason behind you getting the wrong facts…bird… when you try to do things during your normal sleeping hours, errors do creep in!!!!

  28. kharaharapriya Says:

    Simple,
    Nothing personal buddy. But your comments defy logic seriously many times.

    How would you blindly believe that the stats given by congress is true? Don’t you find the necessity to check its veracity yourselves first before you use that ? As said, it just talks of those numbers, how did one arrive at that number, is shady. Since you are providing proof, it should be ur onus to give comprehensive proof. It should be flawless.

    As I said, if one is silent that doesn’t mean they agree. Again skewed logic.

    Even if its true. As said earlier, its not a good metric to measure the scale of the scam or compare CBN and YSR’s role in the scam. We have discussed earlier. That’s basic 5th standard math. If you cant understand I cant help.

    We arent supporting the scams during NDA , its you who bring in the “Caangis” are holier than all kinda stuff everywhere you go.

  29. Simple Says:

    Kharahara

    1. When even you don’t keep quiet at the statistic that I throw, why is TDP keeping quiet?

    TDP has no facts to show their side of the story. On the contrary, the cong spokesperson, who gave this startling statsitc, had a full dossier in front of him as to the number of contracts given by both TDP and Cong.

    Nobody keeps quiet when a wrong accusation is made. Nobody. Not you.

    Wrong allegations are immediately rebutted .

    Example:
    if i allege that you are a diehard suppporter of Congress and Nehru Gandhi dynasty, will you keep silent?

    Yet TDP is strangely silent in spite of the 12% contracts repeated by Congress in all forums.

    it surely indicates something is fishy.

    2. Even if TDP had given lesser contracts, do you think that it absolves TDP of guilt?

    Does it absovle TDP of giving contracts to a crook like Raju?

    Also, there is enough proof to PROVE That RAJU started his fraud in the NDA TDP regime. Because Raju himself has CONFESSED that book cooking started 7 years back, at which time NDA was in power!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    My reasoning is perfect. yours is twisted.

    ***

    Kharahara

    The author jagannathan is too eager to jump to conclusions.

    HE HAS NOT STATED

    1) how many central govt contracts were given totally to other states

    2) he has not stated what percentage of contracts were given to Andhra companies?

    3) Except Satyam, no other scam has come up. So why unncessary focus on Andhra companies when WE DONT KNOW THE EXACT number of contracts given in total to other companies.

    4) Maybe the contracts given to andhra companies is very very very less compared to contracts given to other state companies.

    harahara and chintaka, don’t blindly believe the story written by Jagganath. use your intelligence to check, crosscheck

  30. kharaharapriya Says:

    Simple,
    Wow. Awesome da. You didnt read my post properly.

    I would rather ask the same question to you.
    Giving just 6% contracts would it absolve YSR?
    Even if the fraud started 7 years, the UPA and the Andhra govt have been there for 5 years. What did they do? They should have caught Raju once they came to power rite?
    What about E Sreedharans statement on Hyd metro? You blindly ignore that.
    You were the one saying, YSR was wrongly hounded by media :)

    As usual your interpretations are wrong.
    If you cant understand I cant help. I have in no way supported NDA or TDP. I am just refuting your stupid logic. But as usual you dont have it in you to accept things gracefully.

  31. Simple Says:

    Kharaharapriya:

    Look , did you for once criticise Jagganathan for giving has half information?

    Why are you so eager to believe what Jagganathan writes? He conceals more than he reveals.

    You never once said anyting harsh about NDA or TDP under whose regime the scam started.

    And where did E sreedharan come? we were talking about Jagganathan.and how eager you are to beleive the muck that he writes without any verification. this is scruffy on your part.

    YOu may not have supprted TDP or NDA

    but. but. but.

    you reserve harsh words for Cong
    Similiarly you should have harsh words for TDP and NDA for having started it all?

  32. Simple Says:

    Confused Chintaka

    As usual you never reply to any of my points, but instead you make ridiculous personal charges against me.

    if you constantly call me a licker of Congress, i too can say you are a slave of the sangh parivar.

    a slave who is not allowed to use his brain to think originally.

    you are forced/bound/dictated to parrot exactly what the Bajrang Dal and Ram Sena says

  33. kharaharapriya Says:

    Simple,
    I expected this kinda stupid logic again from you. The bone of contention here which i refuted is the 12%-6% stuff. And I still stand by my statements.
    I havent supported nor refuted jagannathan statement. My objection is against your stupid logic. Which i have made clear. But you can never understand because of reasons known to you.

    I have already made clear whoever is involved in this mess they should be punished.

    Its you who bring in the caangis are holier than others funda everywhere you go, I cant help but ask you questions.

    You havent answered my questions .
    Giving just 6% contracts would it absolve YSR?
    Even if the fraud started 7 years, the UPA and the Andhra govt have been there for 5 years. What did they do? They should have caught Raju once they came to power rite if they were “holier”?

    E Sreedharans public comment carries lot significance. Thats obvious and I need not explain that to you :)

    ***

    Simple,
    When i converse with you, it makes me remember the kannada movie guru shisyaru.
    Check it out.

  34. Simple Says:

    Haraharapriya

    You are escaping. being evasive by calling me stupid.

    1. Thank you for coming around to the view that you have not supported Jagganath’s statement.

    Thats what i was looking for.

  35. kharaharapriya Says:

    Simple,
    Look whos speaking :)
    Of course your logic is skewed which I made it clear .

    Infact its you who’s an escapist . You havent answered this.

    Even if the fraud started 7 years, the UPA and the Andhra govt have been there for 5 years. What did they do? They should have caught Raju once they came to power rite if they were “holier”?

    Nor did you bother to support your statements on sheila, nitish and patnaik in another post. :)

  36. Simple Says:

    Kharaharapriya.

    This posting is about Jagannathan and his unsubstantiated remarks on AP govt.

    Since you say that you do not support Jagganathan, i believe you have accepted what i have to say.

    Rest is incidental.

    I gave you 14 links and you quibbled about it.

    If i give you any more on shela nitish , again you will quibble.

    because you believe in your own shady sources, not the ones which i quote which are far far more credible since it comes from credible publication houses/research organisations/NGOs and govt. sources

  37. kharaharapriya Says:

    Simple,
    Nice joke dear :) Keep ranting.

  38. kharaharapriya Says:

    Simple,
    Me accepting/not accepting jagannathan’s view doesnt mean I accept your views. Again skewed logic. :) Grow up buddy :)

  39. Simple Says:

    kaharharapriya

    i dont accept jaggananthan’s view
    you dont accept jagganathan’s view.

    we both think alike when it comes to jagganathans diatribe against congresss.

    period.

  40. kharaharapriya Says:

    Simple,
    Stupid fella. I didnt accept nor reject jagannathan’s view.
    I only refuted ur stupid logic on percentages. :)
    So there is no question of me and you thinking alike :)
    Again stupid and skewed logic at its best.

  41. Simple Says:

    kharaharapriya.

    my logic is stupid and jagannathan’s logic is not stupid?

    HE HAS NOT STATED

    1) how many central govt contracts were given totally to other states

    2) he has not stated what percentage of contracts were given to Andhra companies?

    3) Except Satyam, no other scam has come up. So why unncessary focus on Andhra companies when WE DONT KNOW THE EXACT number of contracts given in total to other companies.

    4) Maybe the contracts given to andhra companies is very very very less compared to contracts given to other state companies

    Till today you have not (and so has jagannathan) not answered these four points, yet you go on like someone possessed.

    What was my stupid logic on percentages?

    You believe that 12% of X could be lesser than 6% of Y.

    I believe it is absolutely dumb because you don’t know what X or Y is yet, you call my logic stupid, while you don’t use the same label on yorself

    i said even if Naidu gave lesser contracts, does that absolve him of the guilt of association with Raju?

    you have never given me any answer for this. because you have no guts.

    and also while you so freely take a stance on me calling me stupid
    you are hesitant to take any stance on Jagganathan even though his article is full of loopholes and inadueqate informatino, and concealed statistics

  42. kharaharapriya Says:

    Stupid Simple Simon,

    >>I believe it is absolutely dumb because you don’t know what X or Y is yet, you call my logic stupid, while you don’t use the same label on yorself.

    You dont know. X or Y either. Then how dare you use this as a proof?? Isnt it stupid to use half baked proof?? Typical caangis and missionary style of logic you have :)

    >>i said even if Naidu gave lesser contracts, does that absolve him of the guilt of association with Raju?
    As i said if Naidu is guilty prosecute him. YSR isnt holy either. Its you whos shouting on top of your voice trying to portray YSR as mahatma.

    You didnt answer me. What was YSR doin, all the 5 years of his rule?

  43. Simple Says:

    Listen Kharaharapriya

    Both, YSR and Naidu’s dealing with Raju dealt in crores – so naturally i quoted the 12% statistic. The economy has grown in five years….so obviously the size of contract grows too.

    what your small brain cannot understand is:

    1) In a smaller economy of 1999-2004, Naidu gave a phenonmenal 12% to Raju.

    Which means he gave just 88% to others.

    2) In a boom economy period of 2004-2009 Oct, YSR gave just a paltry percentage of 6%

    which means he gave a pheonomenal 94%contracts to others.

    Going by your own statement, even if what YSR gave was a higher figure, it must be pointed out that he GAVE A PHENOMENALLY higher sum to non Raju companies.

    there in lies the ‘betterness’ of YSR in comparision with Naidu.

    What matters is the percentage, not the actual figures. Which is why i always come to 12% and 6%. Naidu was partial to Raju to the extent of 12%, and Naidu to the extent of just 6%

    You point out so called flaws in my thesis.

    Why don’t you point the same flaws in jagganathan’s ill informed article?

    Also i pointed holes in Jagganathans article. I did not say YSR is the cleanest politician on earth.

    so have a cup of nescafe,

    ySR is doing the same NDA did during its five year rule. theres the answer to your question.

  44. kharaharapriya Says:

    Simple,

    Firstly you have no comprehensive proof on 6% , 12%. If you think, that caangis holding a piece of paper in a press conference is proof. I dont buy that. May be people with dinosaur brains like you will :)

    Secondly
    Which are all the companies in the other bracket that YSR gave?? Do they also include contracts given to companies owned by his son, daughter in law etc??
    We can consider MAYTAS as a separate company rite?? :) Raju’s relatives have so many other ventures. Does that 6% and 12% include companies headed by his close relatives as well??

    Of course our ISTUPID SIMPLE WONT UNDERSTAND. He ll lick at all BS thrown by kaangis :)

    >> Going by your own statement, even if what YSR gave was a higher figure, it must be pointed out that he GAVE A PHENOMENALLY higher sum to non Raju companies.

    What are these OTHER companies dear?? What’s the credibility of these OTHER companies. Please enlighten us. :)

    What will our SIMPELLU say for this?

    http://www.dnaindia.com/mobile/report.asp?n=1221351

    I just couldnt control ask this question.
    Which arts college did you study in?? :P

  45. Simple Says:

    Kharaharapriya

    I notice you STILL ARE NOT WILLING TO QUESTION ANYTHING OF JAGGANTATHAN.

    Jagganathan thrown some bare bones at you and you gobble it up unquestioningly.

    when will you learn not to lick what he gives you as shrivelled bones?

    Ask him:

    HE HAS NOT STATED

    1) how many central govt contracts were given totally to other states

    2) he has not stated what percentage of contracts were given to Andhra companies?

    3) Except Satyam, no other scam has come up. So why unncessary focus on Andhra companies when WE DONT KNOW THE EXACT number of contracts given in total to other companies.

    4) Maybe the contracts given to andhra companies is very very very less compared to contracts given to other state companies

    Like I told you, Naidu is keeping silent on 6% 12% figure of Congress. which means only one thing. the figure is true.

    No political opponent keeps silent when charges are levelled taht too in pin point accuracy (6%, 12%). escpecially during election time.

    Fact that naidu is keeping silent means the figure is true.

    You tell me that i have no comprehensive proof of 12%6%, why don’t youi ask Jagganathan the same? whether he has comprehensive proof? why is jagganathan hiding more than he reveals?

    question him, if you have the guts.

    Well, for you information i am not a graduate, neither am very literate. Whichi is why i am not asking any personal questions about you

    Being literate, you are the one who is constantly throwing personal questions at me.

    tch tch. draw the line dude. personal and public life.

  46. kharaharapriya Says:

    Simple,

    >> Like I told you, Naidu is keeping silent on 6% 12% figure of Congress. which means only one thing. the figure is true.
    No political opponent keeps silent when charges are levelled taht too in pin point accuracy (6%, 12%). escpecially during election time.
    Fact that naidu is keeping silent means the figure is true.

    God save you and your stupid brain.

    You should ask naidu y he is keeping quiet. You are one stupid to think that if someone keeps quiet its true.
    As said before, my intent was to refute your stupid logic. Which I have done. My intent was not to refute or accept jagannathan’s claim. First go ask why naidus is silent? :) He would have his reasons. Ask him. Question him if u have guts?? :)

    I need not read Mr. Jaganathan to know of YSR’s yogyate. :)

    Mr. Simple regarding whats personal and public, its all subjective as to whats personal and whats not. For priyanka chopra its personal not to reveal her boyfriend. For kareena its okay to reveal to public. If you would be somewhere outside india and make such statements mind you, you would be roasted :)

    what’s the link between being a graduate and asking personal questions?? :) You seem to watch too much of ekta kapurs serials. Go getta life . Sorry get some logic :)

  47. Simple Says:

    kharahara

    If you ask me if am an arts student , you are intruding into my personal space.

    I have repeatedly asked you to lay off my personal territory.

    I don’t give a damn to if kareena thinks its ok to reveal her boyfriend in public.

    I CERTAINLY don’t want you to question my education qualifications in a public forum. I don’t want to answer that. HOw thick skinned can you be?

    If i ask you to stop asking what I FEEL is personal, you BETTER stop. and don’t talk about it ever again.

    who are you to ask me what my qualification is? i don’t need to answer you. so just shut the hell up regarding my personal life.

    Just stick to the debate.

    1. You say your intent was to refute my logic. My logic is based on what Jagganathan has written. While you so eagerly jump to refute my logic, why don’t you jump to refute Jagganathan’s logic?

    If you have guts, ask Jagganathan:

    1) how many central govt contracts were given totally to other states

    2) he has not stated what percentage of contracts were given to Andhra companies?

    3) Except Satyam, no other scam has come up. So why unncessary focus on Andhra companies when WE DONT KNOW THE EXACT number of contracts given in total to other companies.

    4) Maybe the contracts given to andhra companies is very very very less compared to contracts given to other state companies

    I believe what cong has said about Naidu, because they had files and files of proof. If Naidu does not reply, its not my problem. I cannot force Naidu to reply to something he does not want to.

  48. kharaharapriya Says:

    Stupid Simple,

    Haha your logic on % has no relation to jagannathan. :)
    All you are doing in you 4 points are speculations of may be.
    >> Except Satyam, no other scam has come up. So why unncessary focus on Andhra companies when WE DONT KNOW THE EXACT number of contracts given in total to other companies.

    How stupid can this statement be?? You are surely not a sane Indian citizen. We all know the scale of this scam dear. You say why unnecessary focus.

    As said U dont need Mr Jagannathan’s article to decide on YSRs yogyate. Ella gottirode.

  49. Simple Says:

    Kharaharapriya

    If you think my four points are speculation, what are Jaganathan';s points?

    Hahahaah

    What do you know about YSR’s yogyate?

    hahaah

    We too know Naidu’s yogyate.

  50. kharaharapriya Says:

    Simple,
    As said I am not refuting nor accepting jagannathans claims. But simple will not understand that. Nor am I singing paeans in the name of Naidu, the way you are trying to portray YSR as a mahatma.
    YSR is no mahatma, which is known to everyone and its obvious. Be it reservations, tirupati temple, metro project etc etc. Ofcourse simple wont understand that.
    BTW you have all qualities to join congress. :)

  51. Simple Says:

    Kharharapriya

    I don’t recollect saying YSR is the best CM in India. Nor do i recall saying YSR is a saint.

    You have imaginary ghosts in your mind.

    My main intention was to point out loopholes in Jagganathan’s article.

    If YSR is no Mahatma, what do you think Naidu is?

    His excessive focus on IT in urban areas brilliantly showcased his limited vision.

    BTW you have all qualities to jump into any anti-congres party.

  52. kharaharapriya Says:

    Simple,
    Sorry, I forgot you have short term memory loss :)

  53. Simple Says:

    Kharaharapriya

    Point out where I have told YSR is a saint. Point out where I have told YSR is cleanest politician on earth.

    If i have short term memory loss, you have difficulty in comprehending and grasping issues.

  54. kharaharapriya Says:

    Simple,
    Haha. Look whos speaking about grasping issues. :) Go read all your posts. Go search for yourselves. I am sure you made a statement.
    Atleast if you go through your posts again, I hope you get to know the inconsistencies in your statements.

  55. Simple Says:

    Kaharharapriya

    You are making baseless allegations against me, that I said YSR is a saint.

    Prove it.

    Also, you appear more confused than ever.

    If you can’t then, meekly accept that your postings were full of fallacy and fallacious statements.

  56. kharaharapriya Says:

    Haha simple,

    Go and do some introspection. I have no time for such faltu stuff. Baseless allegations. :) No way. I remember you talking YSR being hounded for no reason et all. But i have no time for digging into all your posts. Do one thing, compile all your posts into one place, I shall read it at leisure and point out where you said so. :)

    Let me tell it in your style.
    Good that you accept YSR is not mahatma now. Which means you ally with my point. End of discussion. :)

  57. Simple Says:

    Kharaharapriya

    If you cannot prove your wild accusations, then please eat your words.

    You cannot end discussions on your own. I am not willing to end it, unless you prove your wild allegations at me.

    Prove. Or apologise.

  58. kharaharapriya Says:

    No apologies. Prove that you didnt make such a statement. :)

  59. Catch2.2 Says:

    Kharaharpriya

    Prove that you did not say TDP is a partywhich is decaying with each passing day.

    Either prove or chew your bombastic, vicious, ego-filled words.

  60. kharaharapriya Says:

    Why should I prove anything to an aira-gaira Catch 2.2 .

  61. Simple Says:

    I see you are escaping.

    Prove where i said YSR is a saint.

    share in AP.

  62. kharaharapriya Says:

    Simple,
    Its semantics dude understand. :) In some post you said YSR is being wrongly hounded by the media. As i said I have very less time for these faltu stuff.

  63. Simple Says:

    Kharaharapriya

    I said Jagganathan is wrong with his facts regardign his article. IN this context i said Jagggantahtn is wrongly hounding YSR.

    Show me proof that YSR is corrupt, then i shall agree with your views.

    You have zero proof yet you blabber about YSR

    At the same time, you say nothing about a failed CM like Naidu.

    Well, if you don’t have time for faltu stuff, don’t make faltu allegations regarding me. and regarding YSR also.

    Prove your allegations. or apoligise. or stop sending faltu postings

  64. kharaharapriya Says:

    Simple,
    Okie, from now on I wont respond to your faltu logic. :)

  65. Simple Says:

    Kharaharapriya.

    Good decision. Glad you have thrown in the towel.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,707 other followers

%d bloggers like this: