Notwithstanding the exponential growth of the print media post-liberalisation, it is clear that the voice of journalists in the publications they bring out is subservient to that of the proprietor, promoter and publisher on most issues and certainly so on the Majithia wage board for journalists and “other newspaper employees”.
Although owners and managers have unabashedly used the columns of their newspapers to rile against higher wages and build “public opinion” against the Majithia wage board through reports, opinion pieces and advertisements, a similar facility has been unavailable for journalists to air their views in the same publications.
It is as if journalists and “other newspaper employees”, whether on contract or otherwise, are in sync with their organisations in opposing the wage board’s recommendations. Which is, of course, far from the truth. Which is, of course, why a nationwide strike has been slated for June 28 to draw attention to journalists’ demands.
So, what do you think?
Is there a case for higher wages for journalists and “other newspaper employees”? Should the Majithia wage board be implemented or should wage boards be abolished? Are newspapers, which are rolling in profits, exploiting journalists with low wages and longer working hours? Or should journalists wisen up to the realities of the modern work place?
Is there truth in the charge that industry organisations like the Indian Newspaper Society (INS) are being used by big newspaper groups to prevent if not stall the new wages? Or is the contention of newspaper owners that they will wilt and crumble under the pressure of a higher wage bill justified?
Also read: Why doesn’t INS oppose no-poaching pacts?
External reading: Why not wage board for all journos and non-journos in media?
Tags: The Hindu, Deccan Herald, Churumuri, The Times of India, Hindustan Times, Praja Vani, Sans Serif, Ravi Dhariwal, Eenadu, Malayala Manorama, Indian Newspaper Society, INS, Majithia Wage Board, Ananda Bazaar Patrika, Bachawat Wage Board, Kundan R. Vyas